Digital Silk Road — 9DASHLINE

BRI 2.0: Reflecting on the past, charting the future

Written by Kelly Antoinette Khyriem

As criticisms propel the initiative towards a BRI 2.0, if China actively addresses and mitigates risks associated with its projects by enhancing transparency and accountability frameworks, it has the potential to outpace the emerging alternatives that are challenging the BRI.

East Asia9DLMarch 29, 20249dashline, BRI 2.0: Reflecting on the past, charting the future, Kelly Antoinette Khyriem, Xi Jinping, China, PRC, Belt and Road Initiative, BRI, Maritime Silk Road, digital infrastructure, trade policy coordination, financial cooperation, multilateral institutions, Memoranda of Understanding, geopolitical strategy, domestic development, US-led international order, ‘string of pearls’ theory, Chinese investments, naval bases, Indian Ocean, crucial shipping routes, debt-trap diplomacy, BRI-related loans, Sri Lanka, economic sovereignty, debt trap narrative, governance deficiencies, corruption, 1Malaysia Development Berhad, 1MDB, China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, CPEC, human rights abuses, BRI infrastructure, BRI commitments, large-scale infrastructure projects, sustainability, ecology, carbon dioxide emissions, environmental implications, EU, US, India, transparency, labour rights, EU-Asia Connectivity Strategy, Global Gateway Initiative, Blue Dot Network, Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment, PGII, G20 Leaders' Summit, hydropower plants, solar farms, 5G, public-private partnerships, Third Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation, Digital Silk Road, e-commerce initiatives, BRI 2.0, Green Belt and Road, renewable energy, Clean Silk Road, Silk Road Economic Belt, Hambantota Port, Kenya, Zambia, Malaysia, debt management, digital connectivity, debt burdens, renewable energy investment, AIIB

How China became the standard maker

Written by Philip Lott

The International Telecommunication Union presents a prime example of how China’s behaviour has changed the institutional dynamics from within and puts pressure on the liberal underpinnings of standardisation.

East Asia9DLOctober 26, 20229DashLine, Philip Lott, International Telecommunication Union, Doreen Bogdan-Martin, United States, US, China, Secretary-General, election, ITU, UN agency, Plenipotentiary Conference, Russia-Ukraine war, Russia, Rashid Ismailov, Houlin Zhao, EU, technical standardisation, internet governance, standardisation organisation, geopolitical competition, China’s ambitions, institutional dynamics, standardisation, global standard setting, standard setting, standards developing organisations, SDOs, technologies, standards, domestic standard, Wi-Fi, hybrid approach, partial convergence, Germany, 2017 Standardisation Law, China Standards 2035, regulatory environment, R&D spending, International Organization for Standardization, ISO, International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, memorandum of understanding, Belt and Road Initiative, BRI, Digital Silk Road, telecom, Huawei, 5G technology, internet architecture, US Federal Communications Commission, Lenovo, Qualcomm, Technologies for Network 2030, 6G, Tomas Lamanauskas

The challenge of Chinese digital payment networks

Written by Felix Garten

Chinese-owned companies that use a Chinese digital payment platform outside of China also must adhere to the standards set by this platform. This could further be extended to companies and businesses that are not Chinese-owned but depend on the platform.

East Asia9DLSeptember 10, 20219DASHLINE, Felix Garten, China, Cyber, Vietnam, Belgian, World Trade Platform, eWTP, Alibaba, Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Digital Silk Road, DSR, Jack Ma, WeChat, Tencent, CCP, LSG, Leading Small Groups, National Intelligence Law, US, United States, India, Europe, Data Security Law, GDPR, Southeast Asia, Beijing

Will China get embroiled in the graveyard of empires?

Written by Velina Tchakarova

It will be interesting to follow how China will navigate this playground, as Beijing is likely to be the next great power to try and fill the void. Perhaps that is exactly why the US is pulling out now — the move could possibly become an American trap if China enters the Afghan quagmire and fails.