post-war international order — 9DASHLINE

Written by Michael J. Mazarr

The US-China relationship is not accurately captured as a power transition, but it is a clash of an often self-righteous leading power and a dissatisfied challenger. That recipe is one of the most combustible in world politics.

Faultlines9DLDecember 2, 20229DashLine, Michael J. Mazarr, The problem is not a power transition, power transition, China, Chinese Communist Party, CCP, Party Congress, 20th Party Congress, national rejuvenation, power, USA, sanctions, great power, United States, hierarchy, world politics, international relations, international relations theory, index of national power, global norms, American strategy, comprehensive national power, international order, GDP, technology, hegemon, hegemony, Beijing, debt, housing bubble, liberal internationalism, Liberal International Order, demographics, fertility rate, dependency ratio, per capita wealth, Autocracy, autocratic rule, material power, Soft Power, diplomacy, World Bank, Taiwan, Japan, Australia, European Union, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, US-Japan-Australia-Taiwan coalition, India, Vietnam, Indonesia, counterbalancing, human rights, UN, post-war international order, power measurement, Stacie Goddard, community of common destiny for mankind, rising power, John Ikenberry, institutionalist theory, exceptionalism, US-led order, Daniel Rosen, Jessica Chen Weiss